Each of these three branches study Public Administration from a different perspective. These types of theories are some of the ways which an administrator can understand and exercise their duties as a public administrator.
Difference between Participatory and Bureaucratic Management 1. In the difference between development administration and traditional public administration of ecological perspective.
The concept of development administration gets momentum in such a situation where nation states exist in the ecology. When people are in the backward states in all respects in an independent nation them development administration emerges. Development of science and technology often accentuates it the main ground of development administration lies in the social instability and higher demand.
The main field of traditional public administration is a colonial society where the colonial government has little role in the betterment of the people.
In fact, all the earlier administrative systems were also traditional. For the absence of economic complexity minimum scientific can technological growth and due to the very nature of agrarian society — traditional administration then existed with its tradition.
In the ultimate analysis, the societal condition and the more or less simple international relationship confirm the existence of traditional public administration.
This is the difference between development administration and traditional public administration. On the basis of the ecological differences of development administration and traditional public administration differ from each other in their objectives.
The objective of development administration is the total change of the system in a very planned way for giving up the socioeconomic and political condition of the country.
The terminal condition of development administration is the image of a good society which is multidimensional in nature.
Traditional public administration, on the other hand, has only the objective of keeping the system going on as it is at present. Its main focus is to uphold the status quo. It is almost clear to say that the traditional bureaucratic system existed mainly for upkeep law and order, justice and collection of revenue whether done on behalf of a monarch or a colonial power.
The objectives of the two administrative systems development administration and traditional public administration determine their scopes.
For very natural reasons the scope of traditional public administration is very limited. On the other hand, for the multiplicity of the nature of development, the scope of development administration is very wide.
It deals with the different dimensions of the society like political, economic administration etc. In the context of the nature of these two types of development administration and traditional public administration there is a number of differences which are as follows: Development administration is innovative in nature.
It is involved in experimental and creative ideas. But tradition public administration parochial in nature and lacks positive thinking.
A prominent characteristic of traditional public administration is its upper-class orientation. Development administration is dealt with all class.
In the difference between development administration and traditional public administration, the traditional public administration is desk oriented and confined within an office. Development administration is field oriented. That is why development administration maintains close contact with people.
There is theoretically, less gap between the administrator and the mass. Traditional public administration is executive type and development administration is the managerial type. In traditional public administration, the role of bureaucrats is confined to the application of the law and they have a sense of superiority.
On the other hand, development administrators are concerned with mobilizing man and resources for the realization of goals and objectives of socio-politico and economic development. One of the main differences between development administration and traditional public administration is that the later is static and the former is dynamic.
The traditional public administration is concerned with the maintenance of stability in the society. But development is highly concerned with the changing ecology and thus it is to maintain dynamics even through risk and problem.
Policy administration dichotomy is prevalent in the traditional public administration.Difference between Development Administration & Traditional Public Administration.
Local government units cannot be isolated from the structure of development administration. Traditional public administration pays little attention to this arena of administration.
Development Administration Traditional Public Administration; . Managing Public Sector Projects: A Strategic Framework for Success in an Era of Downsized Government, Second Edition (ASPA Series in Public Administration and Public Policy) [David S.
Kassel] on timberdesignmag.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Filling a gap in project management literature, this book supplies managers and administrators―at all levels of government―with expert . Bureaucracies can employees, shift towards privatization and quasi- abrogate the power of both citizens and politicians privatization with emphasis on subsidiary companies Transition from Traditional Public Administration to Network Governance via New Public Management; with an Emphasis on the Role of Public in service provision, the.
The Public Services Administration team is available to field public inquiries and coordinate your public service needs with department operations; while conducting financial, customer service, and administrative responsibilities for key areas of front line government services..
The team is absolutely committed to fielding citizen inquiries about city government public services, resolving. Admission requirements vary by program, but generally speaking, the following are required for doctoral programs: Bachelor’s degree from an institution accredited by a U.S.
Department of Education-recognized accrediting agency or an internationally recognized institution. He is a popular less conservative contributor to the Theory of Public Administration in that he produced his own, very popular, theory of traditional public administration, The Scientific Management Theory.